|
"BEING PRESENT":
An Issue Now for 3 Generations
A Washington Post Op-Ed article by Georgetown Law School
Professor David Cole caught a lot of attention among young and older lawyers
and student bloggers. Actually it was about attention. The issue is whether
to allow laptops in law school classrooms. This goes beyond the legal
profession to an issue of more general concern. The broader issue I see
is: Are the tech tools in the professional workplace or school on balance
an asset, a distraction, or evidence of a generation's attention deficit?
WHAT'S GOING ON?
Carolyn Elefant wrote on Legal Blog Watch (April 10, 2007):
"As the internet becomes more and more integrated into our lives,
we're often not aware of the distraction. We think we'll return an e-mail
or two, not recognizing that after the five-minute interruption to send
the e-mail, we need 25 minutes to get back on track. We believe we're
working productively, drafting a brief and returning those e-mails, but
it's not until we turn off our phones, shut off the e-mail and hunker
down on the brief that we really recognize our productivity."
Professor Cole decided to ban use of laptops from the classroom,
which spawned loads of comments on the blogs, including the WSJ Law Blog.
Cole said use of laptops encourages rote transcription which is a detriment
to classroom discussion (some students agree), and too often students
surf the web and do e-mail during class. Even a Harvard law professor,
John Palfrey, who teaches courses on technology and law and allows laptops,
relates that classroom discussion about some serious issue has been disrupted
by a student breaking out in laughter from something read on the laptop
screen.
Elefant's point is that students or young employees don't
recognize the intrusiveness because they have grown up using technology.
They know no alternative way of working. So they genuinely don't distinguish
the difference in their efficiency in class or at work with or without
mixing in sending e-mails, instant messaging, texting or watching something
on the web. That's something they have to learn for themselves, probably
with some mentor's help. Obviously the several studies on the reduction
in efficiency while multi-tasking that have gotten publicity in the last
few years haven't been taken seriously or have not penetrated.
MORE THAN A ONE-GENERATION ISSUE
Plenty of Baby Boomers and Generation X professionals are
continually spied in office meetings, seminars and even client meetings
attending to their BlackBerries (sometimes billing their "distracted"
time to the client, as one of my in-house counsel clients told me). Is
it fear of missing an urgent message, the need to feel indispensable,
time pressure or boredom? (A student blogger wrote that if professors
were more interesting, he wouldn't have been blogging his comment on this
issue at the time.)
For the classroom, Elefant proposed a middle course of action:
allowing laptop use for note-taking but not wireless capability. Even
if such an approach is implemented, it doesn't on its own solve the internet
distraction problem once the students enter the workplace.
* What should the formal or informal rules be?
* When do the pros of allowing internet access during meetings or learning
sessions outweigh the cons? How would this be evaluated?
* What training and guidance on when to use electronic media (at all or
instead of alternative media) should be included in orientation sessions
for new employees so they would understand expectations upfront?
I know that the use/overuse of e-mail and electronic tools
in the professional environment arouses strong feelings by the lively
discussion it provokes at my talks. I invite you to share your thoughts
and ideas for resolution, and I'll gladly give them air time.
© Phyllis Weiss Haserot, 2007. All rights reserved.
Check out *Next Generation, Next Destination*, our blog
about transitioning planning and the generations. Visit, comment and subscribe
by RSS feed or e-mail. http://www.nextgeneration-nextdestination.com
|