|
IMPROVING INTER-GENERATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
In many workplaces today with four generations represented,
there are communication gaps between the partner and director level people
and the more junior professionals and staff. This can probably be attributed
to different generational backgrounds as well as personal behavioral styles
and organizational structure of responsibilities. Another factor is the
prevalence of partnership culture requiring some different approaches
to generational issues than in the more hierarchical corporate culture.
Rather than let these differences hinder maximum productivity, the firm
can provide training to build awareness and break down barriers.
In order to resolve tensions and improve collaboration and
teamwork, it is important to:
- increase familiarity with how each generation sees the world and
what motivates them;
- become aware of behavioral style differences, strengths and weakness
across generational lines;
- use collaborative techniques to begin to change/modify/adjust the
quality of interaction among the various levels of authority and the
generations.
OBJECTIVES
- Achieve mutual understanding of generational differences and personal
behavioral styles.
- Provide tools for dealing with tensions.
- Achieve a more collaborative culture, a more satisfying work environment,
and the foundation for greater productivity, retention, flexibility
and business development results.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The best way to address the issues and show actual progress
in awareness and making new habits is a two (or three) step process which
will encompass large group and small group activities.
I. PREFERRED APPROACH consists of:
A. Large multi-generational group seminar/workshop
on generational differences and their implications.
* Brief primer on characteristics and differences of four generations
in the workplace
* Inter-generational conflicts or tension points in a firm
that affect client service delivery and marketing.
* Opportunities for cooperation - Strategies and tactics
for getting the generations to appreciate each other's strengths
* Making multi-generational teams work - capitalizing on
the assets of each, building trust and respect
* How understanding generational differences helps to understand
and serve clients better.
This session will include interactive exercises to help
shift thinking.
Handout materials will include charts, checklists and articles.
B. The Personal Profile (DiSC Classic dimensions
of behavior) assessment instrument will be completed and interpreted to
provide an understanding of one's own and other people's styles. [For
more than 30 years, this original DiSC instrument has helped many millions
of people to communicate more productively, build positive relationships,
and increase their performance. (And it's fun!)] This will help to increase
cross-generational understanding.
C. Breakout groups on different issues
These will enable inter-generational and multi-dimensional
(behavior dimensions) group problem-solving based on issues determined
previously in key player interviews.
D. Work Expectations assessment for associates, managers and staff.
We will use the Work Expectations assessment tool for self-reporting,
analysis and action planning. This research-based self-assessment provides
feedback on how to take the initiative to get one's expectations met and
adjust expectations when necessary. It is a tool for increasing personal
accountability and satisfaction, since unspoken, unrecognized expectations
in the workplace can lead to tensions, frustration, substandard performance
and reduced commitment.
E. Tie steps A-D into action plans.
II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
If the firm prefers to limit the program on inter-generational
issues and communication to a half day or less in total, the scope would
consist of:
A. Large group interactive seminar described earlier. (A
above)
B. Identifying and interpreting personal behavioral styles.
(B above)
The assessment tool will be completed in advance.
C. How to use the knowledge from (A) and (B) above to improve
communication and collaboration.
.
TIME REQUIRED
The preferred, more comprehensive approach (I) would require
in the range of 7-8 hours from participants. Rather than devoting one
full-day, it would best be absorbed in two modules on different days.
The alternative approach (II) would require about a half
day of participant time
PRINCIPAL PRESENTER/FACILITATOR: Phyllis
Weiss Haserot
|