|
Phyllis Weiss Haserot's
Organizational Effectiveness Issue of the Month
THE UN-PETER PRINCIPLE
June, 2005
In his provocative column on the New York Times Op-Ed page
titled "The Adams Principle" (June 21, 2005), John Tierney made
the argument that workers should emulate John Quincy Adams, who successfully
took a "demotion" to become an accomplished congressman at age
63 after his presidency. "Most workers could keep going longer if
they and employers reconsidered the old assumption about a career trajectory,"
wrote Tierney. He also said "We need to rethink the old assumption
that employees keep getting raises through their careers." [And he
might have mentioned the newer assumption that owners/partners and top
executives must increase their compensation every year even when the firm
has a down year - but I digress.]
While many people whose work is predominantly physical labor
may feel a need or desire to stop working at all at age 60 or 65, professionals
and other knowledge workers may want to keep doing productive work beyond
the typical "retirement" age for the intellectual stimulation
if not the economic need, or both. And employers need their judgment,
experience, maturity, and work ethic. We are just beginning to see this
play out as the baby boomers prepare to leave their long-time careers.
There is a great opportunity here! - but not necessarily
just by keeping people in place. In fact, there are some strong arguments
against letting senior professionals and executives hang around as long
as they want or until they "let go" of their past.
______________________________________________________________________________
Studies show that coaching increases skill
development by 88%! Explore your, or your colleagues', needs
for bringing in more business, internal and external client relations,
navigating firm culture, retention, inter-generational relations or other
workplace issues in a confidential, complimentary interview with Phyllis
by calling 212-593-1549 or e-mail to pwhaserot@pdcounsel.com.
.
______________________________________________________________________________
* Younger people need a place to move up into - or they
will be frustrated and leave.
* Compensation systems often provide a disincentive for keeping older,
more experienced people.
* Many senior professionals and executives would like a change of pace
after a long career and the challenge of new types of work in accord with
their values and what they would like to achieve at this stage of their
life. Sometimes they need a nudge and guidance on how to seize the opportunity
to venture beyond the familiar.
Referring to the shredded historical "economic contract"
between employer and employee (I'm generalizing here, including partners
in professional firms in the term "employees" with no reference
to now questioned definitions of "partnership"), each side now
feels free to abandon the other, but they resent when it happens to them.
The lingering expectations of what they are "owed" can get in
the way of moving on to more fulfilling opportunities elsewhere, not necessarily
in a comparable position. So can an employer's fear that even if the individual
is willing to take a cut in pay and status - often accompanied by the
benefit of increased personal time - they will be frustrated and find
the new position "beneath them,"
So what we see here are issues of attitudes, making (possibly
erroneous) assumptions about other people's choices, and consequently
not offering opportunities that need to be filled.. There are assumptions
that people won't be eager to try something new, possibly something they
had never had time for given high-pressured careers. They may have been
deterred by the desire to maximize their financial compensation either
as a scorecard that measured their worth in other people's eyes or a real
financial need. Perhaps those circumstances have changed and it is time
for them to define success in their own terms.
John Quincy Adams continued to serve as a congressman until
his death at age 80, which was quite an advanced age for those times.
(Given that our modern day presidents are younger in physical fitness
than ever before, we see them go on to do things that would be considered
a "demotion" from being president.) Far from "over the
hill," Adams earned a better reputation for his accomplishments as
a congressman than as president. He did what he wanted to do.
My point is that we will witness a serious waste of talent
and personal unhappiness at a time when organizations of all kinds need
that talent and will have fewer young people to employ, given demographics,
unless there is a change of attitude on the part of both employers and
individuals. Both have to recognize that there are exciting, positive
opportunities just over the horizon. There are important functions not
being performed, particularly in professional development, community relations,
and other people-oriented areas, that senior people can transition into
either at their current organization or somewhere else. Tierney's column
didn't deal with issues of identity and self-worth, which probably were
not Adams' problems, but they are big ones for many successful people.
Some of them need guidance about where to look for opportunities that
are a good fit beyond the obvious. To achieve a good fit culturally, not
just in terms of skills, work needs to be done to change preconceived
notions so that younger colleagues respect the altered status of their
seniors. It's about engaging the values, fresh ideas and energy of the
leading edge of the baby boomers, for example, to reinvent themselves
and continue to make significant contributions.
Personally, I expect to still be dancing outrageously at
91 (or beyond), and to continue to expand my horizons professionally indefinitely.
Part of my mission is to spread that attitude. Who wants to play?
We welcome and encourage your comments to
pwhaserot@pdcounsel.com.
Phyllis
© Phyllis Weiss Haserot. 2005. All rights reserved.
For more information and to learn about personal styles
and applying that knowledge, contact Phyllis Weiss Haserot at 212-593-1549
or pwhaserot@pdcounsel.com. For
information on DiSC personal style assessments: www.pdcounsel.com/training%20coaching%20tools.html
.
Ask about our programs, *Capitalizing
on Your Personal Style* and *
Get a Seat at the Table* and coaching groups on "Building
Your Influence."
Call Phyllis at 212-593-1549 and see www.pdcounsel.com.
To be put on the list for a complimentary subscription to
this e-Alert, send an e-mail to pwhaserot@pdcounsel.com
with "Organizational Effectiveness" in the subject line. And
for my *Inter-Generational Relations* monthly e-tip, put "Inter-Generational
Relations" in the subject line.
|